Most people read
this statement: “What
you resist not only persists, but will grow in size” by Carl Gustav Jung and go
“huh? We commonly resist the things we don’t like. We fight wars on cancer, on
drugs, on obesity. We deal harshly with allegations of “domestic
violence”—about which more later.
Most people think that to fail to resist these things is to condone, to them permit them or to advocate them.
It’s not. It is simply true that what we focus ,we picture, we give emphasis to , we give energy and form to. It is a relative of the well known “self fulfilling prophecy.” Some of this is pure brain science—some of it is the mushier science of psychology. What it is NOT is “woo-woo”-- although the purveyors of woo-woo have annexed it and given it a bad name. It is found in wisdom writings, many of which are “religious”. “I say do not resist an evil person. If someone slaps you on the right cheek, offer the other cheek also” (Matt 5:39). Forgot that one, didn't you? That's OK-- most people do.
But I promised science. So what is the “science”? Well, let’s start with what we notice. We are bombarded every day with stimuli—if we attended to all of them we’d be overwhelmed. (Some say this is what happens in the brains of those with the brain anomaly called”autism.”) “Giftedness is a neurological difference just as is autism in its many flavors.” Brain differences are key in what comes in and how much control we have over that--and our reactions.
So how does our brain assist us to attend only to what is worth attending to? It has a system called the Reticular Activating System. “Attention is the mental process in which a person concentrates awareness on a specific object, issue, or activity and excludes other potential stimuli * from the environment. While the human brain has amazing capabilities for processing information, it also has limited capacity. A person cannot attend to all the information being received through the five senses (sight, hearing, taste, smell, and touch) at any one time.” See” What Parts of the Brain are involved in Paying Attention?”
So what we tell it to attend to it lets in—and what we focus in is thus attended to. Buying a new car? Do you see that model on every commute? Thank your RAS. Far from home and missing that special someone--and "seeing” them in strangers? Probably also the RAS. We see what we look for. We have no choice. If we look for, say, Domestic Violence (or “satanic rituals”) we will see them. For example, the Salem witch trials—or more recently, the infamous McMartin Preschool case. “After six years of criminal trials, no convictions were obtained, and all charges were dropped in 1990. When the trial ended in 1990 it had been the longest and most expensive criminal trial in American history.[1] The case was part of day care sex abuse hysteria, a moral panic over satanic ritual abuse in the 1980s and early 1990s.” Psychologists looked for memories in suggestible children—and viola! They fond them. None was real. Not one.
Most people think that to fail to resist these things is to condone, to them permit them or to advocate them.
It’s not. It is simply true that what we focus ,we picture, we give emphasis to , we give energy and form to. It is a relative of the well known “self fulfilling prophecy.” Some of this is pure brain science—some of it is the mushier science of psychology. What it is NOT is “woo-woo”-- although the purveyors of woo-woo have annexed it and given it a bad name. It is found in wisdom writings, many of which are “religious”. “I say do not resist an evil person. If someone slaps you on the right cheek, offer the other cheek also” (Matt 5:39). Forgot that one, didn't you? That's OK-- most people do.
But I promised science. So what is the “science”? Well, let’s start with what we notice. We are bombarded every day with stimuli—if we attended to all of them we’d be overwhelmed. (Some say this is what happens in the brains of those with the brain anomaly called”autism.”) “Giftedness is a neurological difference just as is autism in its many flavors.” Brain differences are key in what comes in and how much control we have over that--and our reactions.
So how does our brain assist us to attend only to what is worth attending to? It has a system called the Reticular Activating System. “Attention is the mental process in which a person concentrates awareness on a specific object, issue, or activity and excludes other potential stimuli * from the environment. While the human brain has amazing capabilities for processing information, it also has limited capacity. A person cannot attend to all the information being received through the five senses (sight, hearing, taste, smell, and touch) at any one time.” See” What Parts of the Brain are involved in Paying Attention?”
So what we tell it to attend to it lets in—and what we focus in is thus attended to. Buying a new car? Do you see that model on every commute? Thank your RAS. Far from home and missing that special someone--and "seeing” them in strangers? Probably also the RAS. We see what we look for. We have no choice. If we look for, say, Domestic Violence (or “satanic rituals”) we will see them. For example, the Salem witch trials—or more recently, the infamous McMartin Preschool case. “After six years of criminal trials, no convictions were obtained, and all charges were dropped in 1990. When the trial ended in 1990 it had been the longest and most expensive criminal trial in American history.[1] The case was part of day care sex abuse hysteria, a moral panic over satanic ritual abuse in the 1980s and early 1990s.” Psychologists looked for memories in suggestible children—and viola! They fond them. None was real. Not one.
Also, our minds run
on pictures. Try to picture a “not carrot.” It can’t be done. When you read the
word “carrot” there is an instantaneous mental picture.(Dare I say if you verbalize disease, a picture also forms??? or "being fat"?) This has consequences. (Bear with me here.)
Athletes who train
by visualizing their performance often do better then those who practice the
activity physically. Their visualization
is key to performance on the
field as well. “Mental imagery involves the athlete imagining
themselves in an environment performing a specific activity using all of their
senses (sight, hear, feel and smell). The images should have the athlete
performing successfully and feeling satisfied with their performance.” Is this starting to make sense?
As you can easily intuit here, visualizing the poor performance would be highly counterproductive. The picture is an instruction to the body. If the athlete kept playing the error over and over, the body would obey. What he resisted would persist. What he gives focus and attention to is the DESIRED outcome. It works. it has been PROVEN to work.
As you can easily intuit here, visualizing the poor performance would be highly counterproductive. The picture is an instruction to the body. If the athlete kept playing the error over and over, the body would obey. What he resisted would persist. What he gives focus and attention to is the DESIRED outcome. It works. it has been PROVEN to work.
Thus is also true--that not resisting WORKS-- in Aikido, a martial art based on not resisting an attack. Yes—NOT resisting it— (and not ignoring it) but redirecting it. Using these
principles one can –if one is skilled enough—win against any
attacker who uses force against you physically.
(The abov eauthor wrote: “Author’s Note: Within days after writing this essay, the United States
retaliated against terrorist attacks on its embassies. To some, this surgical
use of force seemed appropriate and justified. To others, more specifically the
opponents of the United
States, it seemed to be a provocation, a
challenge, and the second shot fired in a potentially escalating conflict. As
of this writing, security throughout the United States is being tightened.
Airports are being carefully watched. Tourists abroad are warned to be
cautious. Right now, we don’t know what will happen next. I believe that the
next step for Aikido students everywhere is to find a way to apply Aikido’s
philosophy to global conflicts.” (Emphasis mine.)
Ironic note—that was BEFORE “9-11” and for all we know that catastrophic
attack was in part a result of these earlier “resisting” actions. We resisted. The terrorists redoubled
their efforts. We feared—now fear is
our daily lot. What we resisted… persisted. Persists… to this day.
A brief look at history will show the fact that the “treaty of Versailles” (which was
enormously punitive to the Germans) seems to have led to WW II.
“The total reparations demanded was 132 billion gold marks, which was
far more than the total German gold or foreign exchange. The economic problems
that the payments brought, and German resentment at their imposition, are
usually cited as one of the more significant factors that led to the end of the
Weimar
Republic and the beginning of the dictatorship of Adolf
Hitler.”
What is enormously resisted causes enormous opposition. An enormous investment of energy. It results in... more of what was resisted.
This works with dieting as well. What we resist—food we want—becomes an obsession; weight lost though will power dieting is regained—and usually more as well. The 1972 Andean ordeal of the Uruguayan soccer team is also an illustration. Deprived of food, these people became obsessed with food. They dreamed of food. I became obsessed with thirst, wanting water to drink, as a child, after a hurricane be cause—the electricity for our well was out. I focused on thirst. The mind can be very perverse.
It’s human nature---but it is not helpful. And yet, it is real. What we resist persists, what we picture or obsess over because more real and more difficult to live with. And yet we persist in dong this.Many if you are already arguing with me as you read this.Perhaps most.
Another example, which I discovered when a college friend told me he had it, is “paruresis”—the inability to urinate when watched. (Only a problem for men as far as I know.) It is 100% ”body/mind” based and anxiety driven: “A person can be anxious in situations because he perceives a threat even when there is none. His emotions are aroused because of his perception of the condition or situation that he feels traps him.” (Emphasis mine.) If the fear were not causing more fear.. there would be no problem.
Does this mean you are “to blame” if you have this sort of experience? No. As I say it is “human nature,” but I think we know a lot of “human nature” is far from ideal. We teach our kids not to hit each other, or anyone. (We teach them not to urinate when they feel like it!) We teach virtues which are not “human nature”--truthfulness, compassion, forgiveness.. all that “higher” nature stuff.
So what you will be if you can master the art of non resisting is… able to respond-- to respond differently to the stimulus you cannot control. Responsible. But not “blameworthy.” Just more skilled.
Is this easy? No. Is it worth it? I happen to think so. Have I mastered it 100%? HA!
What is enormously resisted causes enormous opposition. An enormous investment of energy. It results in... more of what was resisted.
This works with dieting as well. What we resist—food we want—becomes an obsession; weight lost though will power dieting is regained—and usually more as well. The 1972 Andean ordeal of the Uruguayan soccer team is also an illustration. Deprived of food, these people became obsessed with food. They dreamed of food. I became obsessed with thirst, wanting water to drink, as a child, after a hurricane be cause—the electricity for our well was out. I focused on thirst. The mind can be very perverse.
It’s human nature---but it is not helpful. And yet, it is real. What we resist persists, what we picture or obsess over because more real and more difficult to live with. And yet we persist in dong this.Many if you are already arguing with me as you read this.Perhaps most.
Another example, which I discovered when a college friend told me he had it, is “paruresis”—the inability to urinate when watched. (Only a problem for men as far as I know.) It is 100% ”body/mind” based and anxiety driven: “A person can be anxious in situations because he perceives a threat even when there is none. His emotions are aroused because of his perception of the condition or situation that he feels traps him.” (Emphasis mine.) If the fear were not causing more fear.. there would be no problem.
Does this mean you are “to blame” if you have this sort of experience? No. As I say it is “human nature,” but I think we know a lot of “human nature” is far from ideal. We teach our kids not to hit each other, or anyone. (We teach them not to urinate when they feel like it!) We teach virtues which are not “human nature”--truthfulness, compassion, forgiveness.. all that “higher” nature stuff.
So what you will be if you can master the art of non resisting is… able to respond-- to respond differently to the stimulus you cannot control. Responsible. But not “blameworthy.” Just more skilled.
Is this easy? No. Is it worth it? I happen to think so. Have I mastered it 100%? HA!
But I see how many ways people and society would be served if the concept were better understood…. Society needs to learn to focus on
HEALTH—picture HEALTH—not send out
messages which are about this or that disease. Every mental picture sends commands TO THE BODY. The body obeys.
This is called epigenetics,
and it, too, is real.
Men are now hit with TROs based on mere allegations of "DV" (domestic violence) when an angry ex files. (These really are usually women.) This TRO stays in their records for a LONG time even if they did nothing "violent". (I have seen allegations of "staring.") Or if they did NOTHING AT ALL. The TRO can be dismissed-- but it stays there in the CLETS database and can be seen--will be seen-- by employers..The results of false allegations are a form of violence to these men-- emotionally--and can hurt their ability to obtain work. This does not reduce "violence" --it increases it. it is.. violence increasing by focusing on it. (Yes-- I know this is "heresy" to those who advocate this system. Truth often is!)
So as they say in math --quod est demonstradum, Thus is is proved.
Men are now hit with TROs based on mere allegations of "DV" (domestic violence) when an angry ex files. (These really are usually women.) This TRO stays in their records for a LONG time even if they did nothing "violent". (I have seen allegations of "staring.") Or if they did NOTHING AT ALL. The TRO can be dismissed-- but it stays there in the CLETS database and can be seen--will be seen-- by employers..The results of false allegations are a form of violence to these men-- emotionally--and can hurt their ability to obtain work. This does not reduce "violence" --it increases it. it is.. violence increasing by focusing on it. (Yes-- I know this is "heresy" to those who advocate this system. Truth often is!)
So as they say in math --quod est demonstradum, Thus is is proved.
This is why I have pulled together a lot of stuff I know, here. It is
an effort to make sense--LOGIC-- of the
“non intuitive” concept—"what you resists persists.”
Resist away! (Or not.)
Resist away! (Or not.)
While I agree that what we resists persists I have thoughts on the issue of TROS and ROs as a former DV victim.
ReplyDeleteTROs and ROs are a form of resistance that are basically worthless. They do not protect women. Should they not be issued? Maybe. The punsihment that they invite often happens after a victim is killed.
Should victims be taught to be proactive and change their lives? Maybe that would be better. Often major changes would be required to escape abusers, but perhaps this would be better than worthless pieces of paper. Worthless resistance.
Yes, it is true that the TRO often causes an escalation. That is the sticky wicket for those on the receiving end of DV. These don't work. As far as have been able to determine DISTANCE is the onkly thing that stops the cycle of power and control manipulation. There is no easy answer.
ReplyDeleteBut the societal "bigger picture" is that by focusing singlemindedly on "violence" and solely resisting it by accepting every allegation as true and punishing those accused with zero due process, more violence is enabled--as anyone who has been the target of false DV allegations can tell you. These are usually (but not always) men.
Rats-- I cannot find an "edit" button. (I am so not a fan of this blog platform)so here is a case in point of what was resisted materializing.. Bad press.
ReplyDeleteIt’s slightly ironic that the one thing [Simoes] was trying to avoid was the one thing that came out of all of this,” Katz told the Ottawa Citizen, referring to how much media attention the trial has attracted, compared to that of the original reviews. Katz added that she would probably rethink her decision to post the reviews if she had to do it again.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/07/marisol-simoes-mambo-restaurant_n_1864441.html?ref=topbar